Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mardu Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Lizards | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jund Delirium | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Sacrifice | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Leyline | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , 4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Legends , Boros Auras , Goblins , Golgari Roots , Grixis Bounce , Grixis Control , Grixis Crimes
Meta Performance Analysis
Blackcleave Cliffs ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Blackcleave Cliffs is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 44.20 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.2%. Blackcleave Cliffs has a win rate of 77.4%, making it 5.7% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 8 | 84.4% | 4 |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 5 | 78.6% | 2 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 11 | 76.2% | 5 |
| Demonic Ruckus | Enchantment — Aura | 13 | 73.2% | 4 |
| The Witch's Vanity | Enchantment — Saga | 6 | 71.9% | 2 |
| Desperate Measures | Instant | 15 | 68.9% | 5 |
| Scavenger's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 5 | 67.3% | 1 |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 6 | 66.3% | 2 |
| Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 16 | 65.5% | 5 |
| Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 6 | 65.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Blackcleave Cliffs than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 3 | 9 | 89.2% | 80.0% | +9.2% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 8 | 84.1% | 75.1% | +9.0% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 8 | 80.8% | 73.6% | +7.2% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 80.6% | 73.6% | +7.0% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 9 | 80.4% | 74.2% | +6.2% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 8 | 82.2% | 77.2% | +5.0% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 13 | 77.6% | 73.4% | +4.2% |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 11 | 81.7% | 77.9% | +3.8% |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 77.8% | 74.4% | +3.4% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 23 | 78.6% | 75.5% | +3.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rakdos Sacrifice | 76 | 98.7% | 46.2% |
| Rakdos Aggro | 52 | 85.2% | 57.9% |
| Rakdos Reanimator | 31 | 88.6% | 43.7% |
| Gruul Leyline | 26 | 13.6% | 65.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 25 | 8.0% | 33.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.